Handel v. Handel

48 A.D.3d 566, 853 N.Y.S.2d 91
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 13, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 48 A.D.3d 566 (Handel v. Handel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Handel v. Handel, 48 A.D.3d 566, 853 N.Y.S.2d 91 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

In two related child support proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Simeone, J.), dated May 8, 2007, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Buse, S.M.), dated December 8, 2006, denying, after a hearing, his petition for a downward modification of his child support obligation and awarding the mother child support arrears in the sum of $9,397.50.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Pursuant to a stipulation of settlement that was incorporated into but not merged with the parties’ judgment of divorce, the father was required to pay the mother, who had sole physical custody of the parties’ child, the sum of $200 per week in child support. The stipulation provided that this obligation would terminate if certain “emancipation events” occurred. One such [567]*567event would be if the child had a “[permanent residence away from the residence of [the mother].”

Contrary to the father’s contention, the evidence at a hearing supports the Support Magistrate’s conclusion that the child never had a permanent residence away from the mother’s residence (see Henry v Henry, 272 AD2d 520, 521 [2000]). Accordingly, the Family Court properly denied the father’s objections to the Support Magistrate’s order. Mastro, J.P., Fisher, Dillon and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Lovaglio v. Wagner
2017 NY Slip Op 8269 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Matter of McCarthy v. McCarthy
129 A.D.3d 970 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 A.D.3d 566, 853 N.Y.S.2d 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/handel-v-handel-nyappdiv-2008.