Handel v. Handel
This text of 258 N.E.2d 94 (Handel v. Handel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[855]*855The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative on the ground that respondent-appellant failed to move for a protective order under CPLR 3122 or to show 'cause why his failure to so move was excusable (Zeif v. Zeif, 31 A D 2d 625; Coffey v. Orbachs, Inc., 22 A D 2d 317, 319-320), and neither the Appellate Division nor the Family Court exercised discretion to excuse compliance with CPLR 3122, a discretion which either court undoubtedly had. No other issue is passed upon.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 N.E.2d 94, 26 N.Y.2d 853, 309 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/handel-v-handel-ny-1970.