Handal v. Rushmore Products, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Handal v. Rushmore Products, Inc.

52 A.D.2d 839, 383 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12662

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 3, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 52 A.D.2d 839 (Handal v. Rushmore Products, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Handal v. Rushmore Products, Inc., 52 A.D.2d 839, 383 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12662 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 3, 1975, which denied its motion to vacate a prior order of the same court, dated October 25, 1972, which dismissed its defense of the Statute of Limitations. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. In our view, defendant failed to show a reasonable excuse for its default. Accordingly, it is not entitled to vacatur thereof (see CPLR 5015, subd [a]). Cohalan, Acting P. J., Damiani, Rabin, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 3, 1975, which denied its motion to vacate a prior order of the same court, dated October 25, 1972, which dismissed its defense of the Statute of Limitations. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. In our view, defendant failed to show a reasonable excuse for its default. Accordingly, it is not entitled to vacatur thereof (see CPLR 5015, subd [a]). Cohalan, Acting P. J., Damiani, Rabin, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.2d 839, 383 N.Y.S.2d 554, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/handal-v-rushmore-products-inc-nyappdiv-1976.