Hand v. Fillingame

45 So. 569, 92 Miss. 185
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1907
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 45 So. 569 (Hand v. Fillingame) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hand v. Fillingame, 45 So. 569, 92 Miss. 185 (Mich. 1907).

Opinion

Calhoon, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

James Hand had the title from the government down to February 4, 1904. On that day he made a conveyance to the Eillingames, which, after reciting the consideration, proceeds thus: ■“I convey and warrant unto M. O. and O. A. Fillingame the [189]*189following described land”- — describing it, and then after a period it proceeds thus: “It is further understood and agreed that-the grantor herein reserves and holds a vendor’s lien on the above-described land until all of Nthe purchase money as above-described is fully paid.” Then after another period it proceeds: “It is further understood and agreed that the grantor herein reserves all of the timber standing and growing on the above-described land, which lies on the north side of Beaver Dam branch,, from twelve inches and up at the stump, and is to have full right of way through said lands for the purpose of removing said timber. The grantor hereby agrees to remove said timber within twelve months from this date.” After twelve months expired,. Hand did cut and remove about $15 worth of the timber, for-which he was sued for trespass by the Fillingames, and appeals to this court.

We hold that the meaning of this instrument is that Hand made an absolute conveyance of all this land, which included the timber on it, subject to his right to remove such of the timber as was from twelve inches and up at the stump within twelve months, and that what he did not remove within the twelve months was the property of the grantees, who had a right to the action of trespass against him after the time expired.

Affirmed*

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stewart v. Herring
103 So. 375 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 So. 569, 92 Miss. 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hand-v-fillingame-miss-1907.