Hancock v. State

53 S.W.2d 1114

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hancock v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 120 Tex. Crim. 162 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 9, 1932·No. No. 15664·Published

Opinion

MORROW, P. J.

The offense is burglary; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

Neither bills of exception'nor statement of facts accompany the record.

In the motion for new trial, appellant complains of some arguments charged to have been made. The complaint, however, is not supported by any bills of exception.

No error having been perceived, the judgment is affirmed.

HAWKINS, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, P. J.

The offense is burglary; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

Neither bills of exception'nor statement of facts accompany the record.

In the motion for new trial, appellant complains of some arguments charged to have been made. The complaint, however, is not supported by any bills of exception.

No error having been perceived, the judgment is affirmed.

HAWKINS, J., not sitting.

Hancock v. State, 53 S.W.2d 1114 (Tex. 1932).

Pincite

53 S.W.2d 1114 (Hancock v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.