Hancock v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hancock v. State

204 S.W.3d 330, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1574, 2006 WL 3007786

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 24, 2006·No. No. ED 87623·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Maurice Hancock, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Maurice Hancock, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Hancock v. State, 204 S.W.3d 330, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1574, 2006 WL 3007786 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

204 S.W.3d 330 (Hancock v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.