Hancock v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hancock v. State

402 So. 2d 428, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20137

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 10, 1981

DocketNo. 80-807

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 402 So. 2d 428 (Hancock v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hancock v. State, 402 So. 2d 428, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20137 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

ORFINGER, Judge.

We dismiss the appeal because a verdict of guilty is not appealable. Smith v. State, 395 So.2d 575 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981) [1981 FLW 564]. The notice of appeal is from the verdict and clearly states that there has been no adjudication of guilt. Although an adjudication and sentence subsequently appear in the record, there has been no appeal from either. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1) and § 924.06, Fla.Stat. (1979).

Appeal DISMISSED.

SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORFINGER, Judge.

We dismiss the appeal because a verdict of guilty is not appealable. Smith v. State, 395 So.2d 575 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981) [1981 FLW 564]. The notice of appeal is from the verdict and clearly states that there has been no adjudication of guilt. Although an adjudication and sentence subsequently appear in the record, there has been no appeal from either. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1) and § 924.06, Fla.Stat. (1979).

Appeal DISMISSED.

SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

402 So. 2d 428, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hancock-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack