Hancock v. State

119 So. 921, 23 Ala. App. 634
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 22, 1929·No. 3 Div. 597.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appellant was convicted for- violating the prohibition law by having whisky in his possession. Prom the judgment of conviction he appealed.

The case as tried in the court below presented a clear-cut issue of fact for the determination of the jury. Prom a careful consideration of the whole record, this court is of the opinion that the accused was accorded a fair and impartial trial, free from injurious error; therefore the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hancock v. State, 119 So. 921, 23 Ala. App. 634 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

119 So. 921 (Hancock v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.