Hancock v. HF Holdings, Inc.

S.D. New York

Hancock v. HF Holdings, Inc.

DecidedMay 9, 2021

Docket1:21-cv-01812

StatusUnknown

This text of Hancock v. HF Holdings, Inc. (Hancock v. HF Holdings, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hancock v. HF Holdings, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED . ~------+--- +--+ +--+ +--+ +--+ ++ +--+ +--+ +--+ +--+ X 1 “ |poc#: Roxanne Hancock, : D ATE FILED: 5/9/2021 on behalf of herself and all others similarly — : situated : Plaintiff, : 21-cv-1812 (VSB) -against- : ORDER HF HOLDINGS, INC., et al., : Defendants. :

wane eK VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge: I am in receipt of Plaintiff's letter, dated May 6, 2021, requesting expedited discovery pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(d). (Doc. 12.) “Courts in this district have applied a flexible standard of reasonableness and good cause in determining whether to grant a party’s expedited discovery request.” Digital Sin, Inc. v. Does 1-176, 279 F.R.D. 239, 241 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) (internal quotation marks omitted) (collecting cases). Plaintiff has offered no justification for why expedited discovery is warranted other than that this case was brought as a class action. (See Doc. 12.) Plaintiff is directed to file a letter detailing why good cause exists for her request, especially in light of the fact that Plaintiff has already obtained a certificate of default. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that by May 14, 2021, Plaintiff submit a letter, no longer than three pages, explaining the grounds for her expedited discovery request. SO ORDERED. Dated: May 9, 2021 f pec New York, New York y

Vernon S. Broderick United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED . ~------+--- +--+ +--+ +--+ +--+ ++ +--+ +--+ +--+ +--+ X 1 “ |poc#: Roxanne Hancock, : D ATE FILED: 5/9/2021 on behalf of herself and all others similarly — : situated : Plaintiff, : 21-cv-1812 (VSB) -against- : ORDER HF HOLDINGS, INC., et al., : Defendants. :

wane eK VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge: I am in receipt of Plaintiff's letter, dated May 6, 2021, requesting expedited discovery pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(d). (Doc. 12.) “Courts in this district have applied a flexible standard of reasonableness and good cause in determining whether to grant a party’s expedited discovery request.” Digital Sin, Inc. v. Does 1-176, 279 F.R.D. 239, 241 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) (internal quotation marks omitted) (collecting cases). Plaintiff has offered no justification for why expedited discovery is warranted other than that this case was brought as a class action. (See Doc. 12.) Plaintiff is directed to file a letter detailing why good cause exists for her request, especially in light of the fact that Plaintiff has already obtained a certificate of default. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that by May 14, 2021, Plaintiff submit a letter, no longer than three pages, explaining the grounds for her expedited discovery request. SO ORDERED. Dated: May 9, 2021 f pec New York, New York y

Vernon S. Broderick United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Hancock v. HF Holdings, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hancock-v-hf-holdings-inc-nysd-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack