Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Hancock v. Elmer

Hancock v. Elmer

52 A. 1131, 63 N.J. Eq. 802, 18 Dickinson 802, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 189
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 23, 1902
StatusPublished

This text of 52 A. 1131 (Hancock v. Elmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hancock v. Elmer, 52 A. 1131, 63 N.J. Eq. 802, 18 Dickinson 802, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 189 (N.J. 1902).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Grey delivered in the court' below. See 16 Dick. Ch. Rep. 558.

For affirmance—^The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Garrison, Garretson, Pitney, Bogert, Krueger, Adams, VredenBURGH, VOORHEES—10. For reversal—Dixon, Collins, Hendrickson, Vroom—4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 A. 1131, 63 N.J. Eq. 802, 18 Dickinson 802, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hancock-v-elmer-nj-1902.