Hancock v. Diamond Plate Glass Co.
This text of 77 N.E. 413 (Hancock v. Diamond Plate Glass Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action by appellant upon a gas lease to recover acreage rental. Upon a trial a judgment was rendered upon a verdict in favor of appellee.
The error assigned questions the action of the court in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial.
The case is here on the second appeal. Diamond Plate Glass Co. v. Hancock (1900), 24 Ind. App. 701.
There is nothing in the questions here sought to be reviewed to prevent the application of the general rule that the principles of law deelaréd on the appeal of a case, so far as applicable, remain the law of the case on a subsequent appeal, and must be followed whether right or wrong. The ease is in all respects controlled by the principles of law announced in the case of Hancock v. Diamond Plate Glass Co. (1906), 37 Ind. App. 351, and upon the authority of that case the judgment is' affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 N.E. 413, 38 Ind. App. 699, 1906 Ind. App. LEXIS 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hancock-v-diamond-plate-glass-co-indctapp-1906.