Hancock v. City of Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Hancock v. City of Philadelphia

34 A. 570, 175 Pa. 124, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1221

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 13, 1896·No. Appeal. No. 124·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

The assignments of error to the admission of the testimony are without merit and are.not sustained. The only claim for damages which the plaintiffs could possibly have under our decision in the case, In re Lehigh Street, 81* Pa. 85, was submitted to the jury, and by them decided against the plaintiffs. As to other matters involved in the cause, the opinion of the learned court below on the motion for a new trial is entirely satisfactory to us and for the reasons there stated we affirm the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam,

The assignments of error to the admission of the testimony are without merit and are.not sustained. The only claim for damages which the plaintiffs could possibly have under our decision in the case, In re Lehigh Street, 81* Pa. 85, was submitted to the jury, and by them decided against the plaintiffs. As to other matters involved in the cause, the opinion of the learned court below on the motion for a new trial is entirely satisfactory to us and for the reasons there stated we affirm the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Hancock v. City of Philadelphia, 34 A. 570, 175 Pa. 124, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1221 (Pa. 1896).

Pincite

34 A. 570 (Hancock v. City of Philadelphia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related