Hancock v. City of Philadelphia
This text of 34 A. 570 (Hancock v. City of Philadelphia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The assignments of error to the admission of the testimony are without merit and are.not sustained. The only claim for damages which the plaintiffs could possibly have under our decision in the case, In re Lehigh Street, 81* Pa. 85, was submitted to the jury, and by them decided against the plaintiffs. As to other matters involved in the cause, the opinion of the learned court below on the motion for a new trial is entirely satisfactory to us and for the reasons there stated we affirm the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 A. 570, 175 Pa. 124, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hancock-v-city-of-philadelphia-pa-1896.