Hancock v. Borough of Wyoming

24 A. 88, 148 Pa. 635, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1042
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 25, 1892·No. Appeal, No. 371·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This bill was filed to restrain the borough of Wyoming from removing buildings, fences and improvements, which the complainants allege are upon their private property, and not in the public highway. We have a clear and able report from the learned master, from which it appears that Wyoming avenue has been opened of its full width, and used as a public highway beyond' the memory of any living man. It has probably been so used for, at least, a hundred years. He further finds the fact that the alleged obstructions are not within the lines of the highway as it exists upon the ground. When once a public highway has been located and laid out upon the ground, and used by the public, its location cannot be changed, except by proceedings under the road laws. This would be so, even though the boundaries do not precisely conform to the survey: Commonwealth v. Dicken, 145 Pa. 453.

The decree is affirmed, and the appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hancock v. Borough of Wyoming, 24 A. 88, 148 Pa. 635, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1042 (Pa. 1892).

24 A. 88 (Hancock v. Borough of Wyoming) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hunter v. Bowman
633 A.2d 655 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1993)
Eyer v. Forks Township
7 Pa. D. & C. 227 (Northampton County Court of Common Pleas, 1925)
Curless v. State
87 N.E. 129 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1909)
Shanline v. Wiltsie
78 P. 436 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1904)