Hancock ex rel. Grey v. Steen

2 Miles 273

This text of 2 Miles 273 (Hancock ex rel. Grey v. Steen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hancock ex rel. Grey v. Steen, 2 Miles 273 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1838).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.—

Subrogation is a doctrine of the courts of equity, and is exercised in England by those courts alone. The administration of that doctrine is easy and safe in those courts because by bill, answer, &c., the whole subject matter, on which the court acts, appear of record. It is not so in our courts, unless a prima facie case appears by our records, so that the grounds of the judgment are manifest.

In the present case, the respective equities of the parties do not clearly appear, and the rule must be made absolute. Whether we can entertain any other evidence, aliunde the record, in order to grant relief to a party claiming the benefit of the equitable principle of subrogation, we do not now decide.

Rule absolute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Miles 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hancock-ex-rel-grey-v-steen-pactcomplphilad-1838.