Hance v. Deklyne

3 N.J.L. 659
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 15, 1810·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

— This was very irregular and improper conduct on the part of the justice. If the jury wished to consult with the justice, or receive instruction or information from him, they ought to have come into court and done it publicly. We think that a judgment obtained under such circumstances, ought to he reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hance v. Deklyne, 3 N.J.L. 659 (N.J. 1810).

3 N.J.L. 659 (Hance v. Deklyne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.