Hanau v. Stern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hanau v. Stern

247 A.D. 805

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Orders dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements on each order. Plaintiff has sought to make the complaint sufficient by sprinkling charges throughout that the entire proceedings heretofore had were motivated by fraud and conspiracies, but these loose statements are adequately rebutted. Order denying the plaintiffs application for the appointment of a receiver of the property of named defendants affirmed, with ten dollars costs. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements on each order. Plaintiff has sought to make the complaint sufficient by sprinkling charges throughout that the entire proceedings heretofore had were motivated by fraud and conspiracies, but these loose statements are adequately rebutted. Order denying the plaintiffs application for the appointment of a receiver of the property of named defendants affirmed, with ten dollars costs. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Hanau v. Stern, 247 A.D. 805 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

247 A.D. 805 (Hanau v. Stern) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.