Hanan v. USCIS
This text of Hanan v. USCIS (Hanan v. USCIS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 OFIR HANAN, et al., Case No. 23-cv-02414-HSG 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR 9 y SUMMARY JUDGMENT Re: Dkt. Nos. 22, 24 10 U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS), et al., Defendants. a 12
13 Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Dkt. Nos.
v 14 22, 24. In the months since the parties filed their motions, the Supreme Court decided two © 15 landmark cases that may be relevant to the resolution of the cross-motions: Loper Bright Q 16 || Enterprises v. Raimondo, 144 S. Ct. 2244 (2024) and Department of State v. Mufioz, 144 S. Ct.
= 17 1812 (2024). Given the changed legal landscape, the Court DIRECTS the parties to file
18 || simultaneous supplemental briefs of no more than 10 pages addressing the impact of Loper Bright 19 || and Mufoz on the issues raised in the cross-motions for summary judgment. The supplemental 20 || briefs shall be filed simultaneously by August 16, 2024. No replies are permitted unless the Court 21 so orders, and the cross-motions will be deemed submitted once the supplemental briefs are 22 || received unless the Court orders otherwise. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 || Dated: August 1, 2024 ‘8 25 : HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. 26 United States District Judge 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hanan v. USCIS, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanan-v-uscis-cand-2024.