Hanan v. United States
This text of Hanan v. United States (Hanan v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1693
BABRY HANAN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (1:05-cv-01062-TSE)
Submitted: January 12, 2007 Decided: January 22, 2007
Before WILKINSON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Herbert A. Igbanugo, BLACKWELL IGBANUGO, PA, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for Appellant. Chuck Rosenberg, United States Attorney, Evan Rikhye, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Babry Hanan appeals the district court’s orders denying
his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and denying his motion
for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Hanan v. United States, No. 1:05-cv-01062-
TSE (E.D. Va. November 21, 2005 & May 9, 2006). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hanan v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanan-v-united-states-ca4-2007.