Han v. Trend Management Group

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Han v. Trend Management Group

391 S.E.2d 142, 194 Ga. App. 265, 1990 Ga. App. LEXIS 71

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 18, 1990

DocketA89A2148

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 391 S.E.2d 142 (Han v. Trend Management Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Han v. Trend Management Group, 391 S.E.2d 142, 194 Ga. App. 265, 1990 Ga. App. LEXIS 71 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Carley, Chief Judge.

Appellee-defendants initiated dispossessory proceedings against appellant-plaintiff. When appellant did not answer or open the default, a writ of possession was issued and his possessions were removed from the premises. Subsequently, appellant filed this action against appellees, alleging claims for the “wrongful” removal of his possessions, trespass, slander, and misuse of legal process. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of appellees and appellant appeals.

A review of the record clearly shows that this action constitutes no more than appellant’s unauthorized collateral attack upon the validity of the judgment in the underlying dispossessory proceedings. See Matthews Group & Assoc. v. Wages, 180 Ga. App. 151, 152 (2) (348 SE2d 695) (1986). The trial court correctly granted summary judgment in favor of appellees.

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, P. J., and Beasley, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI