Han Soo Lee v. Riverhead Bay Motors

134 A.D.3d 656, 21 N.Y.S.3d 624
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 29, 2015
Docket16519N 113585/03
StatusPublished

This text of 134 A.D.3d 656 (Han Soo Lee v. Riverhead Bay Motors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Han Soo Lee v. Riverhead Bay Motors, 134 A.D.3d 656, 21 N.Y.S.3d 624 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Saliann Scarpulla, J.), entered December 22, 2014, which, to the extent appealed from, denied nonparty former counsel Edward H. Suh and Associates, P.C.’s motion insofar as it sought interest to run from February 28, 2012 to the date of entry of a final judgment against nonparty current counsel, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Supreme Court properly declined to compute interest under CPLR 5002, as that section allows for interest from the date a verdict is rendered, or a report or decision is made, to the date of entry of a final judgment. Here, there was no verdict, report or decision; rather, by order entered October 18, 2011, Supreme Court (same court and Justice) awarded former counsel $50,000 upon its motion for a proportional distribution of the contingency fee in the underlying personal injury action. Thus, Supreme Court correctly calculated interest pursuant to CPLR 5003, which provides that “[e]very order directing the payment of money which has been docketed as a judgment shall bear interest from the date of such docketing.” Because CPLR 2222 directs that upon request, “the clerk shall docket as a judgment an order directing the payment of money,” Supreme Court correctly concluded that the Clerk erred by refusing to enter the October 18, 2011 order as a judgment when asked to do so on March 19, 2014, and that interest, therefore, should be calculated from the latter date pursuant to CPLR 5003.

We deny respondent’s request for sanctions, as former *657 counsel appeal is not precluded by law of the case, nor is it frivolous. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Manzanet-Daniels and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 A.D.3d 656, 21 N.Y.S.3d 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/han-soo-lee-v-riverhead-bay-motors-nyappdiv-2015.