Hamson v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Hamson v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 1003, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2844

United States Customs Court·Decided February 21, 1968·No. No. P68/84; protest 65/2513 (Boston)·Published

Opinion

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of bicycles, with [1004]*1004or without tires having wheels in diameter (measured to the outer circumference of the tire) over 25 inches, weighing less than 36 pounds complete without accessories, and not designed for use with tires having a cross-sectional diameter exceeding 1% inches and that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Schmidt Pritchard & Co., Mangano Cycles Co. (47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of bicycles, with [1004]*1004or without tires having wheels in diameter (measured to the outer circumference of the tire) over 25 inches, weighing less than 36 pounds complete without accessories, and not designed for use with tires having a cross-sectional diameter exceeding 1% inches and that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Schmidt Pritchard & Co., Mangano Cycles Co. (47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Hamson v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 1003, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2844 (cusc 1968).

Pincite

60 Cust. Ct. 1003 (Hamson v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.