Hamra v. Kansas City Wholesale Grocery

1933 OK 121, 21 P.2d 1042, 163 Okla. 223, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 694
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided February 21, 1933·No. 22262·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Creek county, Okla.. granting a judgment upon supersedeas bond filed in that court in the process of an appeal. Motion to dismiss was filed-October 28, 1931. and no response has been filed thereto.

The brief of the plaintiff in error, which has been filed in this court since the. 7th day of August. 3931, is so manifestly without the rules of this court, as liberal as it is in these matters of briefing, the appeal must be dismissed. In addition to this, from an examination of the authorities cited and the arguments in the brief, it is apparent on the face of the proceedings that the appeal is taken as a. method of-delay only. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Note. — See under (1) 2 R. C. L. 176.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamra v. Kansas City Wholesale Grocery, 1933 OK 121, 21 P.2d 1042, 163 Okla. 223, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 694 (Okla. 1933).

1933 OK 121 (Hamra v. Kansas City Wholesale Grocery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.