Hamra v. Kansas City Wholesale Grocery

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Hamra v. Kansas City Wholesale Grocery

1933 OK 121, 21 P.2d 1042, 163 Okla. 223, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 694

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 21, 1933

Docket22262

StatusPublished

This text of 1933 OK 121 (Hamra v. Kansas City Wholesale Grocery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hamra v. Kansas City Wholesale Grocery, 1933 OK 121, 21 P.2d 1042, 163 Okla. 223, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 694 (Okla. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Creek county, Okla.. granting a judgment upon supersedeas bond filed in that court in the process of an appeal. Motion to dismiss was filed-October 28, 1931. and no response has been filed thereto.

The brief of the plaintiff in error, which has been filed in this court since the. 7th day of August. 3931, is so manifestly without the rules of this court, as liberal as it is in these matters of briefing, the appeal must be dismissed. In addition to this, from an examination of the authorities cited and the arguments in the brief, it is apparent on the face of the proceedings that the appeal is taken as a. method of-delay only. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Note. — See under (1) 2 R. C. L. 176.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Creek county, Okla.. granting a judgment upon supersedeas bond filed in that court in the process of an appeal. Motion to dismiss was filed-October 28, 1931. and no response has been filed thereto.

The brief of the plaintiff in error, which has been filed in this court since the. 7th day of August. 3931, is so manifestly without the rules of this court, as liberal as it is in these matters of briefing, the appeal must be dismissed. In addition to this, from an examination of the authorities cited and the arguments in the brief, it is apparent on the face of the proceedings that the appeal is taken as a. method of-delay only. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Note. — See under (1) 2 R. C. L. 176.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1933 OK 121, 21 P.2d 1042, 163 Okla. 223, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamra-v-kansas-city-wholesale-grocery-okla-1933.