Hamra v. Hamra

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hamra v. Hamra

345 So. 2d 1083, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15904

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 26, 1977

DocketNo. 76-593

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 345 So. 2d 1083 (Hamra v. Hamra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hamra v. Hamra, 345 So. 2d 1083, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15904 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The respondent former husband appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. The main thrust of the appeal is that the court abused its discretion in the financial arrangements for the wife and four minor children. Our review of the record convinces us that no such abuse appears and this portion of the appeal is af[1084]*1084firmed upon authority of Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976); and Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977).

Appellant’s point claiming procedural error does not present reversible error on this record inasmuch as no abuse is shown in the court’s referral of the dissolution and custody matters to a master. Also, the claimed error upon the determination of property rights by the master was not preserved in the record and was not made the subject of an assignment of error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The respondent former husband appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. The main thrust of the appeal is that the court abused its discretion in the financial arrangements for the wife and four minor children. Our review of the record convinces us that no such abuse appears and this portion of the appeal is af[1084]*1084firmed upon authority of Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976); and Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977).

Appellant’s point claiming procedural error does not present reversible error on this record inasmuch as no abuse is shown in the court’s referral of the dissolution and custody matters to a master. Also, the claimed error upon the determination of property rights by the master was not preserved in the record and was not made the subject of an assignment of error.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

345 So. 2d 1083, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamra-v-hamra-fladistctapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack