Hampton v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Hampton v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 1006, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2835

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedFebruary 28, 1968

DocketNo. P68/93; protests 62/7956, etc. (Philadelphia)

StatusPublished

This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 1006 (Hampton v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hampton v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 1006, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2835 (cusc 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Rioi-iaedson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of slags of the same kind in all material respects as the merchandise the subject of Union Carbide Corporation v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 147, C.D. 2565) and Philipp Bros., Inc. v. United States (49 Cust. Ct. 192, Abstract 66939), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rioi-iaedson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of slags of the same kind in all material respects as the merchandise the subject of Union Carbide Corporation v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 147, C.D. 2565) and Philipp Bros., Inc. v. United States (49 Cust. Ct. 192, Abstract 66939), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 Cust. Ct. 1006, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hampton-v-united-states-cusc-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack