Hampton v. United States

12 Ct. Cust. 582, 1925 WL 29459, 1925 CCPA LEXIS 41
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals·Decided April 14, 1925·No. No. 2462·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee' CuRIam :

Appellants filed their application for a rehearing herein March 17, 1925, which the court has carefully considered. No suggestions are made therein which, in the opinion of the court, require any other or different conclusion from that already arrived at by the court. Attention is called to the references by the court, in its opinion, to certain congressional hearings and reports and it is sug[583] gested that such references are in violation of the rule announced in United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association (166 U. S. 290), and other cases. The conclusion reached by the court and expressed in its opinion filed herein does not at all rest upon what may be gathered from the said congressional hearings and reports, but upon other grounds fully stated in said opinion. The said hearings and reports are cited only as further support of the legal conclusion already drawn by the court from the statutory language used. The application for rehearing is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hampton v. United States, 12 Ct. Cust. 582, 1925 WL 29459, 1925 CCPA LEXIS 41 (ccpa 1925).

12 Ct. Cust. 582 (Hampton v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Saks
13 Ct. Cust. 367 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1925)