Hampton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hampton v. State

1912 OK CR 79, 120 P. 1126, 6 Okla. Crim. 726, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 324

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 23, 1912

DocketNo. A-1086.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 79 (Hampton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hampton v. State, 1912 OK CR 79, 120 P. 1126, 6 Okla. Crim. 726, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 324 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Hughes county, at the January, 1911, term thereof, on a charge of selling intoxicating liquors, and his punishment fixed at a fine of one hundred dollars and confinement in the county jail for a period of one hundred days. Upon a careful examination of the record we find no errors sufficient to justify a reversal of this cause. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Hughes county, at the January, 1911, term thereof, on a charge of selling intoxicating liquors, and his punishment fixed at a fine of one hundred dollars and confinement in the county jail for a period of one hundred days. Upon a careful examination of the record we find no errors sufficient to justify a reversal of this cause. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 79, 120 P. 1126, 6 Okla. Crim. 726, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hampton-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.