Hampton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hampton v. State

578 S.W.3d 864

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 30, 2019

DocketWD 81637

StatusPublished

This text of 578 S.W.3d 864 (Hampton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hampton v. State, 578 S.W.3d 864 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam

Alan Hampton appeals the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief as untimely. He contends the motion court clearly erred in dismissing his motion because the untimely filing of his pro se motion was excused on the basis that it was due to circumstances beyond his control. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of dismissal. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

Alan Hampton appeals the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief as untimely. He contends the motion court clearly erred in dismissing his motion because the untimely filing of his pro se motion was excused on the basis that it was due to circumstances beyond his control. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of dismissal. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

578 S.W.3d 864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hampton-v-state-moctapp-2019.