Hampton v. State

359 So. 2d 42, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15744
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hampton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 336 So. 2d 378
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 2, 1978·No. No. 77-1197·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We relinquished jurisdiction of this cause to the trial court with directions that it hear and consider the testimony of two police officers concerning the voluntariness of appellant’s confession. Hampton v. State, 354 So.2d 443 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). We have received and reviewed the testimony of the officers and the findings of the court based on the evidence formerly taken as supplemented by this additional testimony. We find no error in the trial court’s holding that appellant’s confession was voluntarily given. We therefore affirm appel[43]*43lant’s conviction for robbery and the sentence imposed pursuant thereto.1

SCHEB, Acting C. J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hampton v. State, 359 So. 2d 42, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15744 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

359 So. 2d 42 (Hampton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hampton v. State
354 So. 2d 443 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)