Hampton v. Rouse

82 U.S. 684, 21 L. Ed. 250, 15 Wall. 684, 1872 U.S. LEXIS 1303
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 28, 1873·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

*686 Mr. Justice SWAYNE

delivered the opinion of the court.

The case is before us on a motion to amend the writ. It bears teste on the 25th of February, 1873, and was made returnable on the first Monday of December, instead of the second Monday of October, then next ensuing. The commencement of the terms of this court was changed from the former to the latter time by the act of January 24th, 1873. The passage of this act was doubtless unknown to the clerk when he issued the writ. Authority to amend it. in the particular in question is given by the third section of the “act to further the administration of justice,” of June 1st, 1872.

The motion is granted, and the amendment may be

Made accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hampton v. Rouse, 82 U.S. 684, 21 L. Ed. 250, 15 Wall. 684, 1872 U.S. LEXIS 1303 (1873).

82 U.S. 684 (Hampton v. Rouse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walton v. Marietta Chair Co.
157 U.S. 342 (Supreme Court, 1895)
Norton v. City of Dover
14 F. 106 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1882)
Loring v. Wittich
16 Fla. 323 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1878)
Semmes v. United States
91 U.S. 21 (Supreme Court, 1875)