Hampton v. Rouse

Supreme Court

Hampton v. Rouse

80 U.S. 187, 20 L. Ed. 593, 13 Wall. 187, 1871 U.S. LEXIS 1328

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 18, 1872

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 80 U.S. 187 (Hampton v. Rouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hampton v. Rouse, 80 U.S. 187, 20 L. Ed. 593, 13 Wall. 187, 1871 U.S. LEXIS 1328 (1872).

Pincite

Opinion

The CHIEF JUSTICE:

It has often been held that in a writ of error to a joint judgment against several, all must join; and that the omission of one or more, without such proceeding, is an irregularity for which the writ will be dismissed. † The motion in the present case must, therefore, be

Granted.

†

Williams v. Bank of the United States, 11 Wheaton, 414; Owings v. Kincannon, 7 Peters, 399; The Protector, 11 Wallace, 82.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The CHIEF JUSTICE:

It has often been held that in a writ of error to a joint judgment against several, all must join; and that the omission of one or more, without such proceeding, is an irregularity for which the writ will be dismissed. † The motion in the present case must, therefore, be

Granted.

†

Williams v. Bank of the United States, 11 Wheaton, 414; Owings v. Kincannon, 7 Peters, 399; The Protector, 11 Wallace, 82.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 U.S. 187, 20 L. Ed. 593, 13 Wall. 187, 1871 U.S. LEXIS 1328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hampton-v-rouse-scotus-1872.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack