Hampton v. Quitman Manufacturing Co.

104 S.E. 576, 25 Ga. App. 673, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 144
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 5, 1920
Docket11435
StatusPublished

This text of 104 S.E. 576 (Hampton v. Quitman Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hampton v. Quitman Manufacturing Co., 104 S.E. 576, 25 Ga. App. 673, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 144 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The judge properly sustained the demurrer to the petition in this case.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur. J. J. Hill, for plaintiff,

cited: 1 Ga. App. 260 (8); 15 Ga. App. 758 (4); 21 Ga. App. 340 (3), 349; 22 Ga. App. 26, 180 (2); 125 Ga. 576; 98 Ga. 660; 16 Ga. App. 54 (3); 13 Ga. App. 799 (6).

Bennet & Harrell, contra,

cited; Civil Code (1910), § 3129; 127 Ga. 404-6; 123 Ga. 35; 2 Ga. App. 53, 57; 7 Ga. App. 642 (2); 17 Ga. App. 684; 19 Ga. App. 133; 134 Ga. 712; 23 Ga. App. 408; 21 Ga. App. 558; 95 Ga. 15; 139 Ga. 198; 5 Ga. App. 777, 778; 83 Ga. 343; 126 Ga. 667, 670; 7 Ga. App. 268, 584; 10 Ga. App. 175; 23 Ga. App. 334.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

White v. Kennon & Co.
9 S.E. 1082 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1889)
Whatley v. Block
21 S.E. 985 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1894)
Pitts v. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad
27 S.E. 189 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1896)
Crown Cotton Mills v. McNally
51 S.E. 13 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Blount Carriage & Buggy Co. v. Ware
54 S.E. 637 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Hendrix v. Vale Royal Manufacturing Co.
68 S.E. 483 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)
Betts Co. v. Hancock
77 S.E. 77 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)
Vinson v. Willingham Cotton Mills
58 S.E. 413 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Attleton v. Bibb Manufacturing Co.
63 S.E. 918 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Whitfield v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
66 S.E. 973 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)
Brown v. Massachusetts Mills
67 S.E. 832 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)
Southern Railway Co. v. Diseker
13 Ga. App. 799 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Grant v. Royster Guano Co.
84 S.E. 161 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Belk v. Lee Roy Myers Co.
87 S.E. 1089 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
International Cotton Mills v. Carroll
95 S.E. 472 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Berryton Mills v. Parham
98 S.E. 241 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Texas Co. v. Hearn
98 S.E. 419 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 S.E. 576, 25 Ga. App. 673, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hampton-v-quitman-manufacturing-co-gactapp-1920.