Hampton v. Johnson
This text of Hampton v. Johnson (Hampton v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-40470 Summary Calendar
JESSIE HAMPTON,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTE DIVISION
Respondent-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:94-CV-464 - - - - - - - - - - May 21, 1997 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jessie Hampton, # 417856, appeals the district court’s
dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition based upon
abuse of the writ. Hampton has not shown that the district court
abused its discretion in determining that he had shown no cause
or prejudice with regard to issues he had raised in his previous
petition or in regard to issues that he could have raised. See
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-40470 - 2 -
Montoya v. Collins, 988 F.2d 11, 12 (5th Cir. 1993). Nor has
Hampton shown that the court erred in determining that denying
his petition would not result in a substantial miscarriage of
justice.
AFFIRMED; MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hampton v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hampton-v-johnson-ca5-2004.