Hampton v. Flesser

133 Misc. 705, 232 N.Y.S. 641, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 645
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided March 7, 1929·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The final order in the summary proceeding based on non-payment of the February rent was conclusive against the tenant’s claim that the landlord agreed to apply the security to the rent for February. There being no proof as to the issuance of a warrant in the summary proceeding, the term did not end until the removal of the tenant from the premises. (Cornwell, v. Sanford, 222 N. Y. 248.) Prior to such removal the March rent was due and payable. Nor would the claim of surrender and acceptance relieve the tenant of liability for the March rent. It only relieves a tenant from liability accruing after the date of the acceptance of the surrender.

Judgment reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff for the sum of $140, with interest and costs.

All concur; present, Lydon, Callahan and Peters, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hampton v. Flesser, 133 Misc. 705, 232 N.Y.S. 641, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 645 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

133 Misc. 705 (Hampton v. Flesser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schilling v. D/S Dannebrog
320 F.2d 628 (Second Circuit, 1963)
Schilling v. A/S D/S Dannebrog
320 F.2d 628 (Second Circuit, 1963)
Aronson v. Markulin
39 Misc. 2d 273 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1963)
Petrelli v. Kagel
37 Misc. 2d 246 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1962)
Mad-Park Holding Corp. v. Elter
151 Misc. 41 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1934)