Hampton v. Fitzgerald

Supreme Court

Hampton v. Fitzgerald

409 U.S. 1055, 93 S. Ct. 549

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedDecember 11, 1972

DocketNo. A-605

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 409 U.S. 1055 (Hampton v. Fitzgerald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hampton v. Fitzgerald, 409 U.S. 1055, 93 S. Ct. 549 (1972).

Pincite

Opinion

C. A. D. C. Cir. Application for stay of mandate presented to The Chief Justice, and by him referred to the Court, granted pending timely filing of petition for writ of cer-tiorari. Should such petition be so timely filed, this order is to continue pending this Court’s action on the petition. If the petition for writ of certiorari is denied, this order is to terminate automatically. In the event the petition for writ of certiorari is granted, this order is to remain in effect pending the sending down of the judgment of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. A. D. C. Cir. Application for stay of mandate presented to The Chief Justice, and by him referred to the Court, granted pending timely filing of petition for writ of cer-tiorari. Should such petition be so timely filed, this order is to continue pending this Court’s action on the petition. If the petition for writ of certiorari is denied, this order is to terminate automatically. In the event the petition for writ of certiorari is granted, this order is to remain in effect pending the sending down of the judgment of this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

409 U.S. 1055, 93 S. Ct. 549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hampton-v-fitzgerald-scotus-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack