Hampton v. Cumberland Cty.
This text of Hampton v. Cumberland Cty. (Hampton v. Cumberland Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
No. 60PA18 Filed 27 September 2019
DAVID HAMPTON and wife, MARY D. HAMPTON, Petitioners v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY, Respondent
On writ of certiorari pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-32(b) of a divided decision of
the Court of Appeals, 808 S.E.2d 763 (2017), vacating an order entered on judicial
review of a decision of the Cumberland County Board of Adjustment entered by Judge
Robert F. Floyd, Jr. on 13 April 2016 in Superior Court, Cumberland County, and
remanding for additional proceedings. Heard in the Supreme Court on 8 April 2019.
Yarborough, Winters & Neville, P.A., by Garris Neil Yarborough, for petitioner- appellants.
Cumberland County Attorney’s Office, by Robert A. Hasty, Jr., for respondent- appellee.
PER CURIAM.
CERTIORARI IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hampton v. Cumberland Cty., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hampton-v-cumberland-cty-nc-2019.