Hampton v. Allee

43 P. 779, 56 Kan. 461, 1896 Kan. LEXIS 41
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedFebruary 8, 1896
DocketNo. 8104
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 43 P. 779 (Hampton v. Allee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hampton v. Allee, 43 P. 779, 56 Kan. 461, 1896 Kan. LEXIS 41 (kan 1896).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allen, J.:

The ruling of the court sustaining the demurrer to the plaintiff’s amended petition was right. [463]*463The decree of divorce rendered by the district court of Shawnee county contains no provision imposing a liability on the defendant for the support of the minor children, and it has been held that no such liability exists independent of the decree. (Harris v. Harris, 5 Kan. 46.) The petition and exhibit “B” thereto attached make no claim for unpaid alimony, but recovery is sought for the support of the children only.

The judgment is affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Teegarden v. Teegarden
124 P.2d 464 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1942)
Rogers v. Rogers
93 Kan. 114 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1914)
Riggs v. Riggs
138 P. 628 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1914)
Bondies v. Bondies
1913 OK 682 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
Spencer v. Spencer
105 N.W. 483 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 P. 779, 56 Kan. 461, 1896 Kan. LEXIS 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hampton-v-allee-kan-1896.