Hampton v. Allee

43 P. 779, 56 Kan. 461, 1896 Kan. LEXIS 41
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided February 8, 1896·No. No. 8104·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allen, J.:

The ruling of the court sustaining the demurrer to the plaintiff’s amended petition was right. [463]*463The decree of divorce rendered by the district court of Shawnee county contains no provision imposing a liability on the defendant for the support of the minor children, and it has been held that no such liability exists independent of the decree. (Harris v. Harris, 5 Kan. 46.) The petition and exhibit “B” thereto attached make no claim for unpaid alimony, but recovery is sought for the support of the children only.

The judgment is affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hampton v. Allee, 43 P. 779, 56 Kan. 461, 1896 Kan. LEXIS 41 (kan 1896).

43 P. 779 (Hampton v. Allee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Teegarden v. Teegarden
124 P.2d 464 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1942)
Rogers v. Rogers
93 Kan. 114 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1914)
Riggs v. Riggs
138 P. 628 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1914)
Bondies v. Bondies
1913 OK 682 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
Spencer v. Spencer
105 N.W. 483 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1906)