Hampton Ronald Hanley v. Harris County Appraisal District
This text of Hampton Ronald Hanley v. Harris County Appraisal District (Hampton Ronald Hanley v. Harris County Appraisal District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 5, 2005.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-05-00205-CV
HAMPTON RONALD HANLEY, Appellant
V.
HARRIS COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Appellee
On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 04-12896
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
This is an attempted appeal from a judgment dismissing the case signed October 8, 2004. Appellant filed a timely motion for new trial on November 6, 2004. Appellant=s notice of appeal was not filed February 18, 2005.
Appellant=s notice of appeal was not filed timely. When appellant has filed a timely motion for new trial, motion to modify the judgment, motion to reinstate, or request for findings of fact and conclusion of law, the notice of appeal must be filed within ninety days after the date the judgment is signed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a). A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by rule 26.1, but within the fifteen-day grace period provided by rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617-18 (1997) (construing the predecessor to rule 26). Appellant=s notice of appeal was not filed within the fifteen-day period provided by rule 26.3
On April 5, 2005, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court=s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not filed timely. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant filed a response to the notice on April 15, 2005, but his response fails to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed May 5, 2005.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Fowler and Frost.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hampton Ronald Hanley v. Harris County Appraisal District, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hampton-ronald-hanley-v-harris-county-appraisal-di-texapp-2005.