Hampton Country Real Estate, Inc. v. Landow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hampton Country Real Estate, Inc. v. Landow

295 A.D.2d 316, 744 N.Y.S.2d 332, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5770

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 3, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 295 A.D.2d 316 (Hampton Country Real Estate, Inc. v. Landow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hampton Country Real Estate, Inc. v. Landow, 295 A.D.2d 316, 744 N.Y.S.2d 332, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5770 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Oshrin, J.), dated December 11, 2000, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied its cross motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is modified by deleting the provision thereof granting the motion and substituting therefor a provision denying the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment. Ritter, J.P., Krausman, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Oshrin, J.), dated December 11, 2000, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied its cross motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is modified by deleting the provision thereof granting the motion and substituting therefor a provision denying the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment. Ritter, J.P., Krausman, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

295 A.D.2d 316, 744 N.Y.S.2d 332, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hampton-country-real-estate-inc-v-landow-nyappdiv-2002.