Hampton (Anthony) v. State
This text of Hampton (Anthony) v. State (Hampton (Anthony) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
amended notice for habitual criminal treatment under NRS 207.012(2). Both notices included a list of appellant's prior felonies, and respondent presented copies of appellant's judgments of conviction at both sentencings. Furthermore, at the initial sentencing counsel for appellant represented that he had received notice of respondent's intent to seek habitual criminal treatment. Appellant was properly noticed, pursuant to NRS 207.016(2), and we conclude that the district court did not err in adjudicating appellant a habitual criminal under NRS 207.010. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED IN PART AND REVERSED IN PART AND REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order.
J. Hardesty r--
AAA Parraguirre
Cherry
cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge Law Office of Betsy Allen Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
2 (0) 1947A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hampton (Anthony) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hampton-anthony-v-state-nev-2013.