Hampton (Anthony) v. State
Opinion
amended notice for habitual criminal treatment under NRS 207.012(2). Both notices included a list of appellant's prior felonies, and respondent presented copies of appellant's judgments of conviction at both sentencings. Furthermore, at the initial sentencing counsel for appellant represented that he had received notice of respondent's intent to seek habitual criminal treatment. Appellant was properly noticed, pursuant to NRS 207.016(2), and we conclude that the district court did not err in adjudicating appellant a habitual criminal under NRS 207.010. Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED IN PART AND REVERSED IN PART AND REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order.
J.
Hardesty r--
AAA Parraguirre
Cherry
cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge Law Office of Betsy Allen Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hampton (Anthony) v. State (Hampton (Anthony) v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.