Hampson v. Dysart

57 P. 1098, 6 Ariz. 444, 1899 Ariz. LEXIS 135
CourtArizona Supreme Court
DecidedJune 2, 1899
DocketCivil No. 626
StatusPublished

This text of 57 P. 1098 (Hampson v. Dysart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hampson v. Dysart, 57 P. 1098, 6 Ariz. 444, 1899 Ariz. LEXIS 135 (Ark. 1899).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, J. H. Hampson, brought suit in the court below against the appellees, Frank Dysart, treasurer and ex officio tax-collector of Graham County, and Arthur Wight, sheriff and ex officio assessor of said county, to enjoin the collection of certain taxes alleged to have been illegally assessed against him for the year 1896, upon personal property. This case was submitted upon the same briefs and abstract, and is conceded to involve the same questions, as that of Hampson v. Adams (decided at the present term), ante, p. 335, 57 Pac. 621. For the reasons given in the opinion in that ease, the judgment here appealed from is also affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hampson v. Adams
57 P. 621 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 P. 1098, 6 Ariz. 444, 1899 Ariz. LEXIS 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hampson-v-dysart-ariz-1899.