Hampson v. ABC ATLAS VAN LINES

275 S.W.3d 324, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1608, 2008 WL 5456239
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 25, 2008·No. ED 91025·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Robert Hampson (“Hamp-son”) appeals from the judgment of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”), after the Commission found Hampson not permanently and totally disabled as a result of Hampson’s 19 June 2002 work-related accident.

In his sole claim of error, Hampson argues the Commission erred in finding that Hampson was not permanently and totally disabled because the rational the court relies on to make this finding is refuted by the record.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been given a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hampson v. ABC ATLAS VAN LINES, 275 S.W.3d 324, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1608, 2008 WL 5456239 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

275 S.W.3d 324 (Hampson v. ABC ATLAS VAN LINES) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adams v. King
275 S.W.3d 324 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)