Hampel v. Food Ingredients Specialties, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Hampel v. Food Ingredients Specialties, Inc.

708 N.E.2d 211, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1446, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1021

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 7, 1999

Docket99-55

StatusPublished

This text of 708 N.E.2d 211 (Hampel v. Food Ingredients Specialties, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hampel v. Food Ingredients Specialties, Inc., 708 N.E.2d 211, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1446, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1021 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 73143. On appeal of Laszlo J. Hampel. Appeal allowed.

Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

On cross-appeal of Food Ingredients Specialties, Inc. Cross-appeal denied.

On motion to consolidate with case No. 98-1927, Madera v. Satellite Shelters, Inc., Cuyahoga App. No. 73172. Motion denied.

On motion for leave to intervene of Satellite Shelters, Inc. Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 73143. On appeal of Laszlo J. Hampel. Appeal allowed.

Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

On cross-appeal of Food Ingredients Specialties, Inc. Cross-appeal denied.

On motion to consolidate with case No. 98-1927, Madera v. Satellite Shelters, Inc., Cuyahoga App. No. 73172. Motion denied.

On motion for leave to intervene of Satellite Shelters, Inc. Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

708 N.E.2d 211, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1446, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hampel-v-food-ingredients-specialties-inc-ohio-1999.