Hammoud v. Ma'at

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hammoud v. Ma'at. Read the opinion of the Court — 49 F.4th 874
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 28, 2021·No. 19-50914·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 27, 2021

No. 19-50914 ___________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk

Mohamad Youssef Hammoud,

Petitioner—Appellant,

versus

Warden Serkou Ma’at, Federal Correctional Institute Bastrop,

Respondent—Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:18-CV-751

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion November 30, 2020)

Before Owen, Chief Judge, and Jones, Smith, Stewart, Dennis, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Costa, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

No. 19-50914

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 41.3, the panel opinion in this case dated November 30, 2020, is VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hammoud v. Ma'at, (5th Cir. 2021).

Hammoud v. Ma'at (Hammoud v. Ma'at) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.