Hammontree v. Hampton

96 S.E. 1048, 22 Ga. App. 723, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 716
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 16, 1918
Docket9631
StatusPublished

This text of 96 S.E. 1048 (Hammontree v. Hampton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hammontree v. Hampton, 96 S.E. 1048, 22 Ga. App. 723, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 716 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

No substantial merit appears in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial; the verdict directed for the plaintiff was demanded by the evidence; and the court- did not err in overruling the motion for a new, trial. '

Judgment affirmed,

Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 S.E. 1048, 22 Ga. App. 723, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammontree-v-hampton-gactapp-1918.