Hammons v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hammons v. State

158 So. 3d 758, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2776, 2015 WL 848999

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 27, 2015

Docket2D14-2729

StatusPublished

This text of 158 So. 3d 758 (Hammons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hammons v. State, 158 So. 3d 758, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2776, 2015 WL 848999 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

MORRIS, Judge.

Paul Hammons seeks second-tier certio-rari review of a circuit court order reversing a county court order granting him a new trial for the charge of driving under the influence (third offense). The petition for writ of certiorari is untimely, and we do not have the authority to grant belated review of the circuit court order. See Russell v. State, 114 So.3d 483, 484-85 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013).

We note that even if the petition had been timely filed, it is without merit. After a jury found Hammons guilty, the county court granted Hammons’ motion for new trial based on the prosecutor’s comment that Hammons “voluntarily gave up his driver’s license for either one year or 18 months” by refusing to submit to a breath test. The circuit court did not apply the incorrect law in reversing the county court’s order because the challenged statement did not prejudice Hammons. The statement did not suggest that Ham-mons had a prior breath test refusal; rather, the statement was a proper reference to the arresting officer’s testimony regarding the standard warning he gave to Ham-mons on the implied consent for a breath test. See § 316.1932(l)(a)(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2011).

Dismissed as untimely.

CASANUEVA and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORRIS, Judge.

Paul Hammons seeks second-tier certio-rari review of a circuit court order reversing a county court order granting him a new trial for the charge of driving under the influence (third offense). The petition for writ of certiorari is untimely, and we do not have the authority to grant belated review of the circuit court order. See Russell v. State, 114 So.3d 483, 484-85 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013).

We note that even if the petition had been timely filed, it is without merit. After a jury found Hammons guilty, the county court granted Hammons’ motion for new trial based on the prosecutor’s comment that Hammons “voluntarily gave up his driver’s license for either one year or 18 months” by refusing to submit to a breath test. The circuit court did not apply the incorrect law in reversing the county court’s order because the challenged statement did not prejudice Hammons. The statement did not suggest that Ham-mons had a prior breath test refusal; rather, the statement was a proper reference to the arresting officer’s testimony regarding the standard warning he gave to Ham-mons on the implied consent for a breath test. See § 316.1932(l)(a)(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2011).

Dismissed as untimely.

CASANUEVA and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 So. 3d 758, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2776, 2015 WL 848999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammons-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack