Hammons v. State
This text of 962 A.2d 917 (Hammons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
WILLIAM JAY HAMMONS, Defendant Below-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Delaware.
ORDER
CAROLYN BERGER, Justice.
This 26th day of November 2008, it appears to the Court that, on November 3, 2008, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant's failure to diligently prosecute his appeal by not filing his opening brief and appendix in this matter. The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required 10-day period. Therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
962 A.2d 917, 2008 WL 5008573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammons-v-state-del-2008.