Hammons v. Langford

1923 OK 95, 212 P. 985, 88 Okla. 241, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 610
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided February 13, 1923·No. 10864·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MeNEILL, J.

Tbe questions involved in this appeal are identical with the question involved in the case of Mobley v. Langford, No. 10863, this day decided by this court. The facts are practically the same. The same hind and character of supersedeas bond is involved, but the tract of land involved was different. The parties have briefed the cases together and rely upon the same assignments of error, and the giving of the same instructions by the court, and the refusing to give the same instructions requested as in case No. 10863.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed and upon authority of the case of Mobley v. Langford, this day decided.

JOHNSON, Y. O. J. and KANE, KENNA-MER, NICHOLSON, COCHRAN, and BRAN-SON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hammons v. Langford, 1923 OK 95, 212 P. 985, 88 Okla. 241, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 610 (Okla. 1923).

1923 OK 95 (Hammons v. Langford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beindorf v. Thorpe
1927 OK 2 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1927)