Hammond v. White

108 So. 346, 21 Ala. App. 344, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 117
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided April 10, 1926·No. 8 Div. 392.·Published

Opinion

RICE, J.

This is a trial, by the court sitting without a jury, of the right of property between the appellee as plaintiff in execution and the appellant as claimant. The only error assigned is the action of the trial court in rendering judgment for the plaintiff.

The affidavit of claim recites simply that the property levied upon was not that of the defendant in execution, but was the property of the claimant who had a just claim thereto. From the evidence and the brief for appellant it is clear that claimant bases his right to recover upon a lien as for rent and, advances.

In a statutory trial of the right of property, where,the claim to the property is based on a mortgage or lien, the affidavit of claim must state the nature of the right, and, if faulty in this respect, the claimant must be east in the suit. Bennett v. McKee, 144 Ala. 601, 38 So. 129; Ivey v. Coston & Co., 134 Ala. 259, 32 So. 664; Code 1923, § 10379.

The judgment is in accord with the law as above stated. It is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hammond v. White, 108 So. 346, 21 Ala. App. 344, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 117 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

108 So. 346 (Hammond v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Terry v. Allen Bros.
32 So. 664 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1902)
Ivey v. Coston & Co.
134 Ala. 259 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1901)
Bennett v. McKee
38 So. 129 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1905)