Hammond v. United States

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

STODDARD EARL HAMMOND,

Defendant-Movant,

vs. Civ. No. 21-891 JCH/JFR Cr. No. 20-1177 JCH/JFR

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Respondent.

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition by United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar, filed January 24, 2022. CV Doc. 8, CR Doc. 29. Objections were due by no later than February 26, 2022.1 The parties have not filed any objections. The failure to make timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition waives appellate review of both factual and legal questions. U.S. v. One Parcel of Real Property, 73 F.3d 1057, 1059 (10th Cir. 1996). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (CV Doc. 8 and CR Doc. 29) are ADOPTED.

1 On January 24, 2022, the Court mailed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition to Movant. CV Doc. 9. On February 8, 2022, the mail was returned as undeliverable. Id. On February 9, 2022, the Court verified Movant’s mailing address and re-mailed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition to Movant. Adding three days to account for service by mail, Movant’s objections to the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition, if any, were due by February 26, 2022. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Movant’s Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (CV Doc. 1, CR Doc. 27) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJDUCE.

fk ae UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE