Home/Ninth Circuit/Hammond v. Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works

Hammond v. Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works

72 F. 687, 18 C.C.A. 680, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 1741
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hammond v. Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works. Read the opinion of the Court — 70 F. 716 →
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 14, 1896·No. No. 231·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for rehearing is denied. The motion to certify questions of law to the supreme court, having been filed after the decision of the case, and pending the motion for a rehearing, will not be entertained; and, the petition for a rehearing having been denied, the motion to certify is directed to be stricken from the files.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hammond v. Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works, 72 F. 687, 18 C.C.A. 680, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 1741 (9th Cir. 1896).

72 F. 687 (Hammond v. Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.